Advertise With the Virginia Mountaineer Today!
|
|
|
Thanksgiving
Means
Giving
Back
In
observance
of
Thanksgiving
today
(Thursday),
many
local
organizations
and
volunteers
took
time
to
give
back
to
those
in
the
community
who
are
less
fortunate.
Above,
Gift
of
Love
Lighthouse
Ministry
volunteers
spent
a
day
delievering
fruit
baskets
in
the
community
and
meeting
with
the
elderly
and
shut-ins.
The
group
also
helped
prepare
food
boxes
for
needy
families
for
Thanksgiving.
Among
the
volunteers
helping
were,
Lois
Null,
Jan
Ruth
Nichols,
Debbie
Crigger,
Geraldine
Patrick,
Janie
Abbott
Hale,
Kenny
Bartley,
Diane
Wade,
Joyce
Maynard,
Luscas
Shortridge
and
Kirstin
Wade.
In
the
bottom
photo,
Keen
Mountain
Correctional
Center
employees
Sharon
Ferrell,
left,
and
Assistant
Warden
Kevin
Pickerel
load
food
boxes
for
23
families
with
cans
of
corn,
peas,
green
beans,
sweet
potatoes,
cranberry
sauce,
dressing,
gray
and
kool-aid
donated
by
KMCC
employees
to
be
paired
with
turkeys,
rolls
and
pumpkin
pies
donated
by
the
Bluefield
Union
Mission. |
|
|
|
|
Court
Denies
Injunction
to
Stop
VP-3
Mine
Water
Transfer |
|
by
Cathy
St.
Clair
News
Editor
A
temporary
injunction
which
would
have
stopped
Consolidation
Coal
Company
from
dumping
mine
water
into
the
now
idled
VP-3
mine
void
was
denied
last
Thursday
following
a
two-day
hearing
in
Buchanan
Circuit
Court.
Judge
Bob
Williams
denied
the
injunction
request
filed
by
Levisa
Coal
Company,
stating
the
company
had
failed
to
prove
the
standard
of
"irreparable
harm"
required
before
he
could
take
action
to
issue
an
injunction.
Conversely,
Williams
ruled
that
the
harm
to
Consolidation
if
the
"extraordinary
measure"
of
a
temporary
injunction
were
granted
could
be
"astronomical."
"It
could
shut
down
Buchanan
No.
1,"
Williams
said
referring
to
an
opening
statement
made
by
CONSOL
attorneys.
However,
the
court
went
one
step
further
and
decided
a
motion
for
declaratory
judgment
in
the
case,
which
in
effect
granted
Consolidation
the
right
to
dump
mine
water
from
its
Buchanan
No.
1
mine
into
the
VP-3
mine
void.
That
case
had
also
been
pending.
In
commenting
on
the
denied
injunction,
CONSOL
lead
attorney
Buddy
Allen
said,
"I
think
Judge
Williams
was
really
attentive
and
understood
both
sides'
arguments.
"I
think
it
was
really
the
correct
decision
and
we're
pleased
with
that."
Ben
Street,
one
of
three
attorneys
for
Levisa,
declined
to
comment
following
the
hearing,
noting
that
with
litigation
on
the
issue
still
ongoing,
it
was
inappropriate
for
him
to
comment.
The
hearing
began
last
Wednesday.
Street
gave
the
opening
statements
for
Levisa
Coal,
noting
that
the
company
owns
several
tracts
in
the
vicinity
of
VP-3,
some
of
which
have
been
mined,
some
of
which
have
not.
Street
noted
that
Levisa
holds
a
lease
agreement
with
Island
Creek
Coal
Company,
containing
a
non-assignment
clause
which
would
require
Levisa
to
approve
any
transfers
of
the
lease
to
another
company.
When
Island
Creek
became
a
CONSOL
subsidiary,
Street
alleged
the
lease
did
not
automatically
transfer
to
Consolidation
Coal
Company,
which
is
also
listed
as
a
subsidiary
of
CONSOL
Energy.
Street
argued
that
if
Consolidation
Coal
Company
is
allowed
to
fill
up
the
VP-3
mine
void
with
mine
water,
which
it
later
ultimately
plans
to
pump
into
the
Levisa
River,
near
Poetown,
it
will
degrade
the
coal
owned
by
Levisa
underground
at
VP-3
and
further
make
it
inaccessible
for
the
next
17
years
--
the
projected
span
of
time
during
which
the
VP-3
mine
works
will
essentially
be
under
water.
Already,
Street
noted,
Consolidation
has
filled
the
Beatrice
mine
void
with
billions
of
gallons
of
water
and
likewise,
he
said
the
VP-1
mine
is
also
full.
The
rate
of
pumping
mine
water
from
Buchanan
No.
1,
to
VP-3,
Street
said
was
estimated
to
be
some
2,500
gallons
per
minute.
"Consolidation
Coal
Company
is
a
company
that
Levisa
has
no
business
with,"
Street
said.
"They
have
no
contract,
no
deed,
no
lease
and
have
never
given
Consolidation
the
right
to
come
on
the
property
or
look
at
the
property.
We
had
a
lease
with
Island
Creek
Coal
Company
that
gave
Island
Creek
the
right
to
mine.
It
did
not
grant
CONSOL
any
rights
whatsoever."
Street
suggested
that
in
essence,
Consolidation
Coal
Company
was
trespassing
on
Levisa's
property.
"It's
no
different
that
any
other
third
party
whether
it
be
Exxon,
Haliburton
or
Disneyworld,"
Street
said.
Street
said
Levisa
was
concerned
not
only
about
the
inability
to
mine
coal
while
the
mine
is
underwater,
but
also
the
potential
effects
on
coalbed
methane
gas
production,
which
through
an
agreement
with
others,
the
company
receives
production
royalties.
"This
is
not
a
case
of
coming
on
our
property
cutting
a
few
trees
.
.
.,"
Street
said.
| | | |